CARL v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

No. 1543 C.D. 1982.

83 Pa.Commw. 256 (1984)

Rosemary Carl, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

June 12, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leon Ehrlich, Ehrlich & Ehrlich, for petitioner.

Richard F. Faux, Associate Counsel, with him, Richard L. Cole, Jr., Chief Counsel, for respondent, Department of Labor and Industry.

John M. Stott, Austin, Boland, Connor & Giorgi, for respondent, RME Federal Credit Union.

Submitted on briefs April 6, 1984, to Judges DOYLE, PALLADINO and BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE PALLADINO, June 12, 1984:

Rosemary Carl (Claimant) appeals from an adverse ruling by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board), which affirmed the referee's decision to deny benefits because of Claimant's willful misconduct. For the reasons which follow, we reverse.

The facts, which are not in dispute, can be easily summarized. Claimant was employed for more than five years by RME Federal Credit Union (Employer). During the course...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases