1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 101 Wn.2d
  5. 101 Wn.2d 220 (1984)
 

PARBERRY EQUIP. REPAIRS v. JAMES

No. 49682-0.

101 Wn.2d 220 (1984)

676 P.2d 470

GARTH PARBERRY EQUIPMENT REPAIRS, INC., Respondent, v. DENNIS JAMES, Petitioner.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

February 16, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Doherty, Doherty & Ritchie, by Craig A. Ritchie, for petitioner.

Keith L. Kessler (of Stritmatter, Kessler & McCauley), for respondent.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, John R. Ellis, Deputy, and Jon P. Ferguson and Betsy R. Hollingsworth, Assistants, amici curiae.

ROSELLINI, J.

This case, one of first impression, raises the issue of whether the provisions of the automotive repair act, RCW 46.71, apply to persons engaged in the repair of commercial machinery such as logging trucks. The trial court rejected petitioner Dennis James' allegation that the act was applicable. The Court of Appeals, Division One, affirmed (Parberry Equip. Repairs, Inc. v. James, 34 Wn.App. 728,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases