EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant first assigns as error that the trial judge improperly admitted an in-court identification of defendant by Mrs. Hasty. Defendant contends that, in light of a pretrial photographic lineup that Mrs. Hasty viewed, the State did not present sufficient evidence to show that Mrs. Hasty's in-court identification of defendant as the perpetrator of the crime was of independent origin. We do not agree.
Identification evidence must be excluded...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
