STATE v. BROWET, INC.

No. 50893-3.

103 Wn.2d 215 (1984)

691 P.2d 571

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BROWET, INC., ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 6, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herrmann, Levenson, Margullis & Buckley, by Charles J. Herrmann and Sherilee M. Luedtke, for appellants.

William H. Griffies, Prosecuting Attorney, Chris Quinn-Brintnall, Chief Criminal Deputy, and Barbara L. Corey-Boulet, Appellate Deputy, for respondent.


DIMMICK, J.

We here decide whether due process mandates that a jury trial be afforded under RCW 7.48.080, the contempt provision of the moral nuisance statute. We hold that since this statute allows a criminal penalty, Washington case law requires a jury.

Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Gallegos, purchased the Dawn Sauna and World Gift Shop property on a real estate contract from Browet, Inc. Prior to 1980, appellants operated the Dawn Sauna as a house of prostitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases