STATE v. FORT


197 N.J. Super. 113 (1984)

484 A.2d 323

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD H. FORT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TASIN S. MUHAMMED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, for appellant Richard H. Fort (Arnold I. Budin, Designated Counsel, of counsel, and on the brief).

Richard H. Fort, appellant, filed a supplementary brief, pro se.

George L. Schneider, Prosecutor of Essex County, for respondent (Marc J. Friedman, Assistant Essex County Prosecutor, of counsel, and on the letter briefs).

Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, for appellant Tasin S. Muhammed (William E. Norris, Designated Counsel, of counsel, and on the brief).

Before Judges ANTELL, J.H. COLEMAN and SIMPSON.


The majority opinion of the court was delivered by J.H. COLEMAN, J.A.D.

The crucial question raised by this appeal is whether a plea agreement between the State and two codefendants, which requires them not to testify on behalf of defendants-appellants herein, automatically entitles defendants to a new trial. Stated differently, the core question is whether defendants were denied their right to compulsory process. We hold they were not.

An Essex County Grand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases