IN RE MARRIAGE OF TOZER v. TOZER

No. 83-626.

121 Wis.2d 187 (1984)

358 N.W.2d 537

IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: William S. TOZER, Petitioner-Respondent and Cross-Appellant, v. Catherine L. TOZER, Appellant and Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided October 9, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant and cross-respondent the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mark H. Hoskins, Jr., and Hoskins Brown of Lancaster.

For the respondent and cross-appellant there were briefs by Thomas H. Geyer and Kopp, McKichan, Geyer, McKichan, Curry & Geyer of Platteville, and Rebecca A. Erhardt and Boardman, Suhr, Curry & Field as cocounsel of Madison.

Before Foley, P.J., Dean and Cane, JJ.


CANE, J.

Catherine Tozer appeals an order refusing to grant relief from a divorce judgment. She contends that the property division should be reopened in order to award her a portion of William Tozer's military pension. The pension was excluded from the property division as then required by federal law. After the judgment was entered, however, the United States Congress changed the law to permit division of military pensions. Because the trial court awarded more property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases