Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on December 23, 1964. In this proceeding to discipline him for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the special referee and respondent submits an affirmation in opposition to said motion.
The special referee sustained four charges of professional misconduct, to wit, conversion of his client's funds, failing to maintain a duly constituted escrow account...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.