B. AND H.S. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALBINAS HOLLY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS. CONSOLIDATED WITH: B. AND H.S. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WILLIAM W. INVENAL, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 16, 1984.
Decided December 14, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Richard O. Venino argued the cause for appellants Middleton and Burpee interests.
Erwin D. Apell argued the cause for appellants Scott and Green interests (Apell and Mathews, attorneys; Donald N. Elsas, on the brief).
Edward C. Eastman, Jr., argued the cause for appellant Carmine Giordano (Lomurro, Eastman and Collins, attorneys).
Murray J. Laulicht argued the cause for respondent (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp and Szuch, attorneys; Murray J. Laulicht, Elizabeth M. Callaghan and Barbara A. Moore, on the brief.)
Before Judges FRITZ, FURMAN and DEIGHAN.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by FURMAN, J.A.D.
In consolidated actions to quiet title to a contiguous 4,085 acre parcel partially in Burlington County and partially in Ocean County, an individual answering defendant and two groups of answering defendants appeal to us from partial summary judgment quieting title in favor of plaintiff B. and H.S. Corporation. We are constrained to reverse and remand because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
