1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 100 A.D.2d
  5. 100 A.D.2d 175 (1984)
 

COHEN v. HERBAL CONCEPTS

100 A.D.2d 175 (1984)

Susan Cohen et al., Appellants, v. Herbal Concepts, Inc., Defendant, and The Hearst Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 8, 1984

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gair, Gair & Conason, P. C. (Herman Schmertz of counsel), for appellants.

Lola Sullivan Reynolds, Richard H. Sugarman and Thomas A. Bisdale for The Hearst Corporation, respondent.

Sabin, Bermant & Blau (Ralph P. Huber and Nancy K. Nadler of counsel), for The Conde Nast Publications, Inc., respondent.

KASSAL, J., and CARRO, J. P., concur in a memorandum by KASSAL, J.; ASCH, J., concurs in a separate memorandum; SILVERMAN and BLOOM, JJ., concur in a separate memorandum by SILVERMAN, J.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (ALVIN KLEIN, J.), entered on June 24, 1982, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion denied and the first and second causes of action reinstated.

KASSAL, J. (concurring).

Plaintiffs appeal from an order which granted the motions by defendants, The Hearst Corporation (Hearst), The Conde Nast Publications, Inc. (Conde Nast...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases