TATE v. BLUE CROSS OF WASHINGTON AND ALASKA

No. 1269, September Term, 1983.

59 Md. App. 206 (1984)

474 A.2d 1353

PHYLLIS TATE v. BLUE CROSS OF WASHINGTON AND ALASKA.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

May 14, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan M. Jenkins, Washington, D.C., with whom were Jenkins & Kurz, Washington, D.C., Lois R. Sacks and Fey, Wagner & Sacks, Rockville, on the brief, for appellant.

Anne G. Collins, Washington, D.C., with whom were Whiteford, Hart, Carmody & Wilson, P.C., and Charles J. Steele, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for appellee.

Argued before MOYLAN, LOWE and BELL, JJ.


MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellee is Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska (Blue Cross). The only question on this appeal is that of what business engaged in by Blue Cross or obligation undertaken by Blue Cross will bring it within the reach of Maryland's "long-arm" statute and subject it, therefore, to the in personam jurisdiction of the courts of this state.

Blue Cross is a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington and qualified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases