1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 12 Ohio
  5. 12 Ohio St. 3d 247 (1984)
 

SAUNDERS v. CHOI

No. 83-1085.

12 Ohio St. 3d 247 (1984)

SAUNDERS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CHOI, APPELLEE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 1, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Peter Onysko, for appellants.

Quandt, Giffels, Buck & Rodgers Co., L.P.A., Mr. Joseph R. Tira and Mr. Robert G. Quandt, for appellee.

SWEENEY, J.

The plaintiff-appellant submits that R.C. 2305.15, 2305.19 and Civ. R. 3(A) must be read in pari materia, meaning that the two statutes and the civil rule are to be construed together.2 It is the appellant's contention that since defendant-appellee, Dr. Chul Choi, has been continually absent from the state of Ohio since June 30, 1977, R.C. 2305.15 tolls the time limitation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases