1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 159 Cal.App.3d
  5. 159 Cal.App.3d 86 (1984)
 

CONVERSE v. FONG

Docket No. A011966.

159 Cal.App.3d 86 (1984)

205 Cal. Rptr. 242

GEORGE H. CONVERSE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HELEN FONG, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

August 15, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Siegfried Hesse, Dodge, Reyes, Brorby, Randall & Titmus, Howard H. Jewel, Jewel & Leary and E. Elizabeth Summers for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Eric P. Schnurmacher, Charles A. Hansen, John R. Hetland, and Hetland & Hansen for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

LOW, P.J.

Mutuality of remedy is not a prerequisite to granting specific performance if there is sufficient assurance of each party's performance of the agreed obligations. We remand this case to the trial court to determine if equitable considerations should otherwise justify specific performance.

In January 1978, defendant Helen Fong offered to sell the family home to plaintiffs George and Marie Converse. An agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases