1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 147 (1984)
 

IN RE ACKERMAN

95 N.J. 147 (1984)

469 A.2d 924

IN THE MATTER OF MONROE ACKERMAN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

September 13, 1983.

Decided January 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Badolato argued the cause for the Disciplinary Review Board (Colette A. Coolbaugh, Secretary, attorney).

Monroe Ackerman argued the cause pro se.

PER CURIAM.

These disciplinary proceedings generate disquieting echoes of In re Ackerman, 63 N.J. 242 (1973), in which this same respondent was publicly reprimanded on a charge that he "did not disclose to his client that the complaint had been dismissed or that a default had been entered as to the counterclaim, and further that, after the dismissal and the default, respondent affirmatively assured his client that the litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases