BAUMAN v. AUTO-OWNERS INS. CO.

Docket No. 72089.

133 Mich. App. 101 (1984)

348 N.W.2d 49

BAUMAN v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 21, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pinsky, Smith & Soet (by Edward M. Smith and Mary A. Dinkel), for plaintiff.

Linsey, Strain & Worsfold, P.C. (by Larry D. Vander Wal), for defendant.

Before: ALLEN, P.J., and R.M. MAHER and R.H. BELL, JJ.


R.H. BELL, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order entered in the Kent County Circuit Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment determining that, as a matter of law, plaintiff was not entitled to recover no-fault benefits.

During the course of his employment with Spartan Stores, plaintiff was required to drive a truck and to aid in the unloading of the truck's trailer. Plaintiff was injured while he was moving boxes to the door of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases