RIVERA v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO.


197 N.J. Super. 34 (1984)

484 A.2d 30

ANGEL RIVERA AND RAMONA RIVERA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, SUBSIDIARY OF THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 9, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven J. Boda argued the cause for appellants (Juman & Juman, attorneys).

Thomas M. Kelly argued the cause for respondent (Morley, Cramer, Tansey, Haggerty & Fanning, attorneys).

Before Judges MORTON I. GREENBERG, O'BRIEN and GAYNOR.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I. GREENBERG, P.J.A.D.

This case arises from dismissal of claims by plaintiffs for personal injury protection benefits (PIP) under the No-Fault Act (N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq.) on the ground that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. The claims derive from an accident on July 15, 1979. On that date plaintiff Angel Rivera was operating his automobile which was insured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases