1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 740 F.2d
  5. 740 F.2d 1541 (1984)
 

PETERSEN MFG. CO. v. CENTRAL PURCHASING, INC.

Appeal No. 83-1006.

740 F.2d 1541 (1984)

PETERSEN MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Appellant, v. CENTRAL PURCHASING, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 3, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard N. Aronson and James E. Siegel, Scarsdale, N.Y., argued for appellant. With them on the brief were Elia Weinbach, Los Angeles, Cal., and Susan Friedman.

William H. Pavitt, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., argued for appellee.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, BENNETT and NIES, Circuit Judges.

NIES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from the grant of summary judgment by the United States District Court of the Central District of California (Real, C.J.), entered April 18, 1983, dismissing a complaint by Petersen Manufacturing Co. for patent infringement and unfair competition, and from an award of attorney fees to the accused infringer, Central Purchasing, Inc. Petersen asserts that summary judgment was improvidently granted in that genuine issues of material...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases