IN RE JACOB


95 N.J. 132 (1984)

469 A.2d 498

IN THE MATTER OF HOWARD L. JACOB, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 24, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Colette A. Coolbaugh, Counsel, argued the cause for complainant Disciplinary Review Board.

Richard J. Schachter argued the cause for respondent (Schachter, Wohl, Cohn & Trombadore, attorneys; John F. Bracaglia, Jr., on the brief.)


PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding was presented initially before the District XII Ethics Committee. An investigation of the respondent had been initiated on the basis of the complaint of an attorney who represented a banking institution that held a mortgage on premises that were the subject of a sale. The mortgage was to have been satisfied from the sale proceeds. When the mortgage thereafter went into default, inquiries revealed that the mortgage had not been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases