DOOLEY v. BARBERTON CITIZENS HOSPITAL

No. 83-40.

11 Ohio St. 3d 216 (1984)

DOOLEY, APPELLANT, v. BARBERTON CITIZENS HOSPITAL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 27, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Johnson & Helmuth, Mr. R. J. Helmuth and Ms. Taryn L. Stambaugh, for appellant.

Messrs. Roetzel & Andress, Mr. K. R. Aughenbaugh and Mr. Jeffrey J. Casto, for appellee.

Messrs. Bergson, Borkland, Margolis & Adler, Mr. Howard Adler, Mr. Edward J. Westbrook, Messrs. Sinrod & Tash and Mr. Werner Strupp, urging reversal for amicus curiae, American Podiatry Association.

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Mr. James P. Friedt and Ms. Anne C. Griffin, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Podiatry Association.

Messrs. Bricker & Eckler and Mr. Richard C. Pfeiffer, Jr., urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Hospital Association.


LOCHER, J.

The issue before us is whether Barberton Citizens Hospital, through its by-laws, illegally discriminated against appellant, a licensed Doctor of Podiatric Medicine because of his practice as a podiatrist. For the reasons set forth below we find such discrimination had occurred. Accordingly we reverse the court of appeals and remand as hereinafter set forth.

This cause has witnessed a number of transformations in the hospital's by-laws. Because of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases