MULDER v. MITTELSTADT

No. 83-1635.

120 Wis.2d 103 (1984)

352 N.W.2d 223

Gerard W. MULDER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Norbert F. MITTELSTADT, William Mittelstadt, Mary C. Mittelstadt, and Plymouth Die-Mold, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 20, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendants-appellants, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Mike P. Fortune of Colwin, Fortune, Colwin & Pomeroy, S.C. of Fond du Lac.

For the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Welker and Paul M. Ryan of Brennan, Steil, Ryan, Basting & MacDougall, S.C. of Janesville.

Before Scott, C.J., Brown, P.J., and Nettesheim, J.


BROWN, P.J.

This is an appeal from a stockholder's derivative action. The trial court held that Norbert Mittelstadt had breached his fiduciary duty as a director of Plymouth Die-Mold, Inc. causing direct injury to the corporation. The appellants, the Mittelstadts and Plymouth-Die Mold, Inc., assert that the trial court erred in ordering certain monetary assessments against Norbert Mittelstadt as a result of this breach. We agree with the trial court's decision and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases