PROFESSIONAL SEMINAR CONSULTANTS v. SINO AM. TECH.

No. 83-1725.

727 F.2d 1470 (1984)

PROFESSIONAL SEMINAR CONSULTANTS, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SINO AMERICAN TECHNOLOGY EXCHANGE COUNCIL, INC., and G.Y. Lin, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 13, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold B. Auerbach, Robert J. Dauphin, Auerbach & Dauphin, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Thomas M. Maddock, and Martin T. Snyder, Sellar, Engleking, Hazard, Snyder & Kelly, Walnut Creek, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Before WRIGHT, CHOY, and POOLE, Circuit Judge.


EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Professional Seminar Consultants, Inc. (PSC) sought sanctions against Sino American Technology Exchange Council (SATEC) and G.Y. Lin because they had produced falsified documents in this suit for conversion and libel. We find that the magistrate did not abuse his discretion when he entered a default judgment and punitive damages for PSC.

PSC conducts professional seminars abroad. In 1980, PSC paid SATEC to make tour arrangements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases