1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 739 F.2d
  5. 739 F.2d 1434 (1984)
 

VUCINICH v. PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC.

No. 83-5946.

739 F.2d 1434 (1984)

Jennie VUCINICH, Appellant, v. PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Philip F. Moore, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen J. Capeloto, Richard L. Rubin, Capeloto & Rubin, San Francisco, Cal., Robert L. Kramer, Palm Springs, Cal., for appellant.

Charles Siegal, Munger, Tolles & Rickershaueser, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, and GOODWIN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jennie Vucinich sued Paine, Webber and the firm's employee, Moore, alleging that she had sustained losses caused by the defendants' investment advice. The district court ruled in favor of defendants on motions for summary judgment and dismissal and plaintiff appealed. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In 1977, Vucinich sought advice from Philip F. Moore on how best to hold a portfolio of stocks and mutual fund shares she had inherited. Moore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases