1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 163 Cal.App.3d
  5. 163 Cal.App.3d 54 (1984)
 

BERRIS & SEATON v. MEYERS

Docket No. A15973.

163 Cal.App.3d 54 (1984)

210 Cal. Rptr. 444

BERRIS & SEATON, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. AUDREY MEYERS et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents; TED ORLISS, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

November 14, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Berris & Seaton and John W. McClure for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.

Leonard Horwin for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents.

Schroeder & Davis and Ted Orliss for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

REESE, P.J. —

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Plaintiff, a law firm, filed separate complaints at different intervals against defendants Cohen and Meyers seeking attorney fees allegedly due and owing by defendants. Approximately one year later, the court granted defendants' motions consolidating the actions, and authorized the filing of a separate cross-complaint, by defendant Meyers against both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases