MAST INDUSTRIES, INC. v. REGAN

No. 84-8-01129.

596 F.Supp. 1567 (1984)

MAST INDUSTRIES, INC. and Country Miss, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Donald T. REGAN, Secretary of the Treasury, William Von Raab, Commissioner of Customs, the United States Treasury Department, the United States Customs Service and the United States, Defendants, and American Fiber/Textile/Apparel Coalition, Defendant-Intervenor. RETAIL INDUSTRY TRADE ACTION COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE, et al., Defendants, and American Fiber/Textile/Apparel Coalition, Defendant-Intervenor. LAURA ASHLEY, INC., Liz Claiborne, Inc., Marisa Christina Holdings, Inc., U.S. Shoe Corp., Plaintiffs, v. Donald T. REGAN, Secretary of the Treasury, William Von Raab, Commissioner of Customs, the United States Treasury Department, the United States Customs Service and the United States, Defendants, and American Fiber/Textile/Apparel Coalition, Defendant-Intervenor.

United States Court of International Trade.

October 4, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mandel & Grunfeld, New York City (James Resti and Robert B. Silverman), New York City, for plaintiffs in Mast Industries, Inc. et al. v. Regan, et al.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City (Stuart M. Rosen, Richard Davis, and Jeffrey Bialos), Washington, D.C., for the plaintiffs in Retail Industry Trade Action Coalition, et al. v. United States Customs Service, et al.

Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, P.C., New York City (Allan H. Kamnitz and Anthony Y. Cheh), New York City, for plaintiffs in Laura Ashley, Inc. et al. v. Regan, et al.

Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., (Kevin C. Kennedy) Washington, D.C., for defendants in Mast, Retail Industry Trade Action Coalition and Laura Ashley N/A.

Miller & Chevalier, Washington, D.C. (Donald Harrison, James P. Tuite, and Kenneth B. Reisenfeld) Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenors in Mast, Retail Industry Trade Action Coalition and N/A Laura Ashley.


DiCARLO, Judge:

Plaintiffs, importers and retailers of textile products, are challenging interim regulations amending requirements for importing textiles and textile products that are subject to quantitative limitations under bilateral trade agreements or pursuant to unilaterally imposed restraints. These actions, consolidated September 28, 1984, raise questions about the authority delegated to the President under Section 204 of the Agricultural Act of 1956, as amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases