CROWELL v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COM'N

No. 83-3285.

724 F.2d 1406 (1984)

Alfred CROWELL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided January 16, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan Ellis, David M. McGlaughlin (argued), Ellis, Fogelnest & Newman, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

David Dart Queen, U.S. Atty., Albert R. Murray, Asst. U.S. Atty., Harrisburg, Pa., Henry J. Sadowski (argued), Regional Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before ADAMS, BECKER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question whether the application of revised parole regulations of the U.S. Parole Commission to appellant Alfred Crowell, a federal prisoner, violated his rights under the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution. Between the time Crowell committed his crime and the time he was considered for parole, the parole regulations were revised by the Commission to require a longer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases