1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 746 F.2d
  5. 746 F.2d 1379 (1984)
 

UNITED STATES v. RIGGANS

No. 82-1101.

746 F.2d 1379 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Anthony RIGGANS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julia Barash, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Randy Sue Pollock, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and EAST, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Following an en banc determination that the district court could not impose an adult sentence upon a youth offender who had violated probation under 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b) and § 5017(c), without conviction of another offense, this case was returned to this panel to consider a due process claim that was not passed upon by the en banc court. United States v. Won Cho, 730 F.2d 1260, 1275, n. 22 (9th Cir.1984...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases