1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 596 F.Supp.
  5. 596 F.Supp. 1529 (1984)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

596 F.Supp. 1529 (1984)

R. Stockton RUSH III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

November 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lovell & Stewart, New York City, for plaintiff; Victor E. Stewart, New York City, of counsel.

Joan Caridi, New York City, for defendant Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

This is a motion for reargument seeking reinstatement of the plaintiff's punitive damages claim appended to the common law fraud count of the complaint. The motion is granted and the prior order of August 23, 1984, striking the punitive damage claim, is vacated.

Procedural Background

This case was commenced on May 8, 1984 by Rush ("Rush") seeking damages against his securities broker Oppenheimer & Co....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases