1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 744 F.2d
  5. 744 F.2d 1380 (1984)
 

SATTERWHITE v. SMITH

Nos. 83-3668, 83-3692.

744 F.2d 1380 (1984)

Eugene SATTERWHITE, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Frank J. Howard, Ray E. Meeks, and John W. Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard Dale SMITH and Jane Doe Smith, his wife; Jack A. Fabulich and Jane Doe Fabulich, his wife; Robert G. Earley and Jane Doe Earley, his wife; S. Reed Jones and Jane Doe Jones, his wife; William Ross and Jane Doe Ross, his wife; and the Port of Tacoma, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided October 10, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clair Mancini, Gerald L. Hulscher, Dolack, Hansler, Hulscher, Burrows, Dayhoff & Barline, Tacoma, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jocelyn J. Lyman, Bergman & Bauer, Seattle, Wash., James J. Mason, Tacoma, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, and PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Four black men — Frank Howard, Ray Meeks, John Smith, and Eugene Satterwhite — sued the Port of Tacoma and several of its officers for violating their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, & 1985(3) (1982). After conducting a full trial on the merits, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington dismissed the claims of Howard, Meeks, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases