1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 163 Cal.App.3d
  5. 163 Cal.App.3d 43 (1984)
 

PEOPLE v. HOUSMAN

Docket No. 21583.

163 Cal.App.3d 43 (1984)

210 Cal. Rptr. 186

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RACHEL HOUSMAN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

November 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rachel Housman, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Charles D. Haughton, City Attorney, and Seth Weisbord, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

REESE, P.J. —

I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was cited for violation of Beverly Hills Municipal Code section 3-6.2205(a). That ordinance is part of a legislative scheme establishing preferential parking zones in designated sections of the City of Beverly Hills. The pertinent sections of the ordinance read:

"Sec. 3-6.2202. Residential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases