TAYLOR v. SETTECASE

No. 125,774; A26518.

673 P.2d 1384 (1984)

66 Or.App. 332

Duane F. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Philip K. SETTECASE, Howard P. Smith and Darwin V. Doss, Dba Payne, Settecase, Smith & Doss Architecture, Respondents, C.A. Lantz Construction Co., an Oregon Corporation, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 4, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Daniel J. Gatti, and Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

Richard H. Allen, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Allen, Stortz, Fox & Susee, Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


WARDEN, Judge.

In this action for damages, plaintiff alleged that he orally contracted with defendants for their architectural services. Defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that the action was not commenced within the two-year limitation period in ORS 12.110. The trial court granted the motion and entered judgment for defendants. We affirm.1

The issue presented on appeal is whether the two-year limitation in ORS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases