FRIEDLANDER v. TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMAN, ETC.

Civ. A. No. C84-208A.

595 F.Supp. 1442 (1984)

Herman FRIEDLANDER, individually on behalf of himself and all former minority common shareholders of Nimslo Technology, Inc., Plaintiff, v. TROUTMAN, SANDERS, LOCKERMAN & ASHMORE, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

October 15, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry A. Brachtl, New York City, Edward L. Greenblatt, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff.

John T. Marshall, Thomas S. Richey, Robert L. Connelly, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant.


ORDER

SHOOB, District Judge.

This is an action for alleged fraud by defendant in connection with the forced sale of stock owned by plaintiff. Defendant served as the law firm of certain defendants in a related case, Friedlander v. Nims, 571 F.Supp. 1188 (N.D.Ga.1983); plaintiff alleges that defendant participated in the fraudulent schemes of the defendants in the Nims case.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases