1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 740 F.2d
  5. 740 F.2d 1282 (1984)
 

UNITED STATES v. DiPASQUALE

Nos. 83-1364, 83-1365, 83-1367 to 83-1369 and 83-1449.

740 F.2d 1282 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony DiPASQUALE, Appellant in No. 83-1364, Appeal of James DiPASQUALE, in No. 83-1365. Appeal of August REDDING, aka "Porky", in No. 83-1367. Appeal of John SERUBO, in No. 83-1368. Appeal of Peter SERUBO, in No. 83-1369. Appeal of Victor SZWANKI, in No. 83-1449.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided July 31, 1984.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied August 28, 1984.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied September 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Jeffrey Weisenfeld (argued), Goldberger, Feldman, Dubin & Weisenfeld, New York City, for appellants Anthony DiPasquale and James DiPasquale.

Edward Reif, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant James DiPasquale.

Jeffrey L. Staniels (argued), Asst. Defender, Joseph M. Miller, Asst. Defender, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant August Redding.

Robert A. McAteer (argued), Baratta & Takiff, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant John Serubo.

John Rogers Carroll (argued), Carroll & Carroll, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant Peter Serubo.

Ronald Ervais (argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant Victor Szwanki.

Edward S.G. Dennis, Jr., U.S. Atty., E.D.Pa., Philadelphia, Pa., Brenda Gruss (argued), U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Ronald G. Cole, Sp. Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Philadelphia, Pa., William C. Bryson, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before SEITZ and GARTH, Circuit Judges, and PORTER, District Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied in Nos. 83-1364, 83-1365, 83-1368, 83-1669 August 28, 1984.

Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied in No. 83-1449 September 11, 1984.

OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Circuit Judge.

The six appellants were convicted and sentenced on one count of conspiracy to collect "claimed debts" by extortionate means in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 894(a). Five of the six were convicted and sentenced on various counts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases