1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 742 F.2d
  5. 742 F.2d 1196 (1984)
 

UNITED STATES v. ESCOBAR DE BRIGHT

No. 81-1648.

742 F.2d 1196 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hilda ESCOBAR DE BRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Resubmitted March 12, 1984.

Decided September 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel G. Knauss, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert Murray, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.

Before FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

Resubmitted to Original Panel March 12, 1984.

Argued En Banc January 12, 1984.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

After abolishing the long standing concurrent sentence doctrine, an en banc panel, 730 F.2d 1255, remanded this case to the original panel to decide the merits of the defendant's challenge to her conspiracy conviction.1 We now hold that the district court committed reversible error in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases