1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 678 P.2d
  5. 678 P.2d 1257 (1984)
 

CORDILL v. CITY OF ESTACADA

No. 82-2-160; CA A24996.

678 P.2d 1257 (1984)

67 Or.App. 481

Raymond A. CORDILL and Barbara J. Cordill, Husband and Wife, and Nicholas B. Cordill and Jason C. Cordill, Minors through Raymond A. Cordill, Their Guardian Ad Litem, Appellants-Cross-Respondents, v. The CITY OF ESTACADA, a Municipal Corporation, the City Council of the City of Estacada, and City of Estacada Building Inspector, Robert S. Connelly, Respondents-Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emil R. Berg, Portland, argued the cause for appellants-cross-respondents. With him on the briefs was Wolf, Griffith, Bittner, Abbott & Roberts, Portland.

John W. Osburn, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents-cross-appellants.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.

WARDEN, Judge.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. Petitioners seek to compel respondents to revoke a building permit for, and require removal of, a car wash built in violation of zoning ordinances. They also seek to prevent respondents from changing any applicable zoning ordinances. Petitioners appeal from a judgment ordering the City and the City Council to conform the use of the property to the zoning ordinances, seeking a more specific mandate. Respondents cross...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases