1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 735 F.2d
  5. 735 F.2d 1194 (1984)
 

McLANE & McLANE v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA

No. 83-2617.

735 F.2d 1194 (1984)

McLANE & McLANE, an Arizona law partnership; William Lee McLane and Nola McLane, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Lee McLane and Nola McLane, pro se, and McLane & McLane, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Richard A. Segal, Gust, Rosenfeld, Divelbess & Henderson, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee.

Before CHOY, PREGERSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

CHOY, Circuit Judge:

The district court granted Prudential Insurance Company of America's (Prudential) motion for summary judgment and denied McLane & McLane's summary judgment motion. We reverse and direct the district court to enter summary judgment for the plaintiffs and to determine the amount of damages to be awarded.

I. BACKGROUND

On June 15, 1973, McLane & McLane, an Arizona law firm, and Valley Bank Building, Inc. (Valley Bank) entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases