PER CURIAM.
The dispositive question in this appeal is whether a person charged with obtaining money by false pretenses may be convicted upon uncorroborated testimony by a single witness that such a pretense occurred. We hold that corroboration is statutorily required. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction in this case is reversed.
Harold Krepp, a building contractor, entered into an agreement with Mr. and Mrs.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.