1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 674 P.2d
  5. 674 P.2d 1218 (1984)
 

STATE v. PETERSON

No. DA 247807; CA A27677.

674 P.2d 1218 (1984)

66 Or.App. 747

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Roger PETERSON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 25, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Janet A. Metcalf, Portland, argued the cause, for appellant. With her on the brief was English & Metcalf, Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals a conviction for prostitution (ORS 167.007) after trial to the court. He contends that statements he made to a police officer following his arrest should have been suppressed because he was not advised of his constitutional rights as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We reverse and remand.

The arresting officer testified that he advised defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases