PURYEAR v. EDE'S LTD.

No. 83-4312 Summary Calendar.

731 F.2d 1153 (1984)

Robert & Nina PURYEAR, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EDE'S LTD., etc., et al., Defendants, Charles Eilert and Edith Eilert, individually, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clyde Hurlbert, Biloxi, Miss., for defendants-appellants.

Acevedo & Tisdale, Robert M. Acevedo, Biloxi, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before TATE, GARWOOD and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.


PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

After consent by all parties, this diversity case was referred to a magistrate for trial and the entry of final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Appellants, relying on Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, 712 F.2d 1305 (9th Cir.1983), claim that magistrates in trying such cases exercise powers reserved under the Constitution to Article III judges.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases