1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 586 F.Supp.
  5. 586 F.Supp. 1256 (1984)
 

UNITED STATES v. RAGUSA

CR-83-0429.

586 F.Supp. 1256 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Fillipo RAGUSA, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

April 30, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Dearie, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y. by William Cunningham and Mark Summers, Asst. U.S. Attys., Brooklyn, N.Y., Murry Richman, Bronx, N.Y., for defendant Golio.

Jeffrey A. Rabin, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant Bartolotta.

Jacob R. Evseroff, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant Scaduto.

Anthony Lombardino, Kew Gardens, N.Y., for defendant Altamura.

Raymond Sussman, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant Logalbo.

Arnold Taub, New York City, for defendant Aiello.

Charles F. Carnese, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant Graffeo.

Maria T. Candelaria, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant Volpe.

Patrick Burke, Suffern, N.Y., for defendant Ducato.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

COSTANTINO, District Judge.

In the above-entitled action, all defendants have challenged pursuant to Title 18 § 2518(10), the legality of the interceptions of wire communications authorized by New York State and Federal eavesdropping orders, which the government seeks to use as evidence against them. The defendants' primary contention is that the second wiretap order ("Salemi # 2"), was an illegally obtained extension...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases