DRIVER v. DRIVER

No. 82-2393.

119 Wis.2d 65 (1984)

349 N.W.2d 97

James O. DRIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Constance F. DRIVER, Constance J. Driver, Robert Driver and James O. Driver, Jr., Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided April 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Roger G. Schnitzler and Van Metre, Hanson, Clarke, Schnitzler & Meyer of Madison.

For the defendants-respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Carl W. Ross and Kittelsen, Barry, Ross and Wellington of Monroe.

Before Gartzke, P.J., Dykman, J. and Rudolph T. Randa, Reserve Judge.


DYKMAN, J.

James O. Driver appeals from a summary judgment. The trial court held that appellant raised no relevant factual issues, that his attempted amendments to the bylaws of the United Telequipment Corporation were invalid because contrary to statute, and that respondents' actions in adding themselves to the corporation's board of directors and removing appellant as president were valid. We affirm the judgment.

Prior to July 1982, appellant was the president...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases