1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 11 Ohio
  5. 11 Ohio St. 3d 172 (1984)
 

STATE v. LEUIN

No. 83-1661.

11 Ohio St. 3d 172 (1984)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. LEUIN, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 20, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Berry, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. James W. Skogstrom, for appellant.

Mr. Horace W. Baggott, Sr., and Mr. Daniel J. O'Brien, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The question presented by this appeal is whether specific instances of conduct may be proved by extrinsic evidence to establish or attack the credibility of a witness. Evid. R. 608(B) provides that:

"Specific instances of the conduct of a witness, for the purpose of attacking or supporting his credibility, other than conviction of crime as provided in Rule 609, may not be proved by extrinsic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases