1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 681 P.2d
  5. 681 P.2d 1133 (1984)
 

EVANS v. HOGUE

No. 41-025; CA A22210; SC 29674.

681 P.2d 1133 (1984)

296 Or. 745

Walter EVANS and Julie Evans, Husband and Wife, Respondents On Review, v. Harry E. HOGUE and Betty J. Hogue, Husband and Wife, and Jeannette K. Mundt, Petitioners On Review. Harry E. Hogue and Betty J. Hogue, Husband and Wife, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Mary M. Wall, Third-Party Defendant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided April 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Morgan, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review Jeannette K. Mundt. With him on the briefs was Wood, Tatum, Mosser, Brooke & Holden, Portland.

Andrew Rich, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondents on review. With him on the brief was Huffman & Zenger, P.C., Hillsboro.

ROBERTS, Justice.

This appeal is from an action to quiet title. The trial court awarded title to plaintiffs. The Court of Appeals also found for plaintiffs by concluding that plaintiffs had adversely possessed against their predecessors for the requisite period. We affirm but on different grounds.

The disputed land consists of approximately two and one-half acres and is located as shown on the diagram.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases