STOLTZFUS v. ULRICH

Civ. A. No. 82-1822.

587 F.Supp. 1226 (1984)

Edward A. STOLTZFUS, Plaintiff, v. Roy E. ULRICH, Sr., Ross Ulrich, Lester Hershey, Individually, and Roy E. Ulrich, Supply, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

May 1, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harvey Miller, Lancaster, Pa., for plaintiff.

James Clymer, Lancaster, Pa., for defendants.


OPINION

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

PROCEEDINGS

This matter, having been called for trial and the defendants having presented certain motions which were responded to and argued before the court yesterday, we find it necessary, therefore, to forthwith dispose of the motion or motions pending before proceeding to the question of trial. Hence, we accomplish that result by virtue of a bench opinion which, unfortunately, is not sometimes presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases