STATE v. HILL

No. 82-973; CA A28735.

675 P.2d 1134 (1984)

66 Or.App. 7

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Carl Otto HILL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 15, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied April 6, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Rosenbaum, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the third degree and carrying a concealed weapon. He raises 12 assignments of error, none of which is well taken. We write only to note that, contrary to defendant's (and, to a certain extent, the trial court's) guest passenger theory of the law of assault, it was permissible to charge and convict defendant of assault by injuring the passenger in his car through his criminally negligent operation of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases