1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 687 P.2d
  5. 687 P.2d 1111 (1984)
 

DAMES v. CITY OF MEDFORD

Nos. 83-099; CA A32514.

687 P.2d 1111 (1984)

69 Or.App. 675

William S. DAMES, Respondent, v. CITY OF MEDFORD, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 12, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene F. Hart, Jr., Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

William S. Dames, Medford, argued the cause for respondent William S. Dames, pro se. With him on brief was Dames & Dames, Medford.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Dames appealed to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) from the city's decision to enter into a contract for the widening of a street. Pursuant to ORS 197.845, LUBA ordered the street-widening project stayed while the appeal was pending and required Dames to post a $5,000 bond. LUBA found in the city's favor on the merits of the appeal and affirmed the decision. The city then moved for attorney fees and damages. It appeals from LUBA's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases