1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 690 P.2d
  5. 690 P.2d 1099 (1984)
 

NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS CO. v. CITY OF PORTLAND

A8302-00967; CA A28765.

690 P.2d 1099 (1984)

70 Or.App. 647

NORTHWEST NATURAL GAS CO., Pacific Power & Light Co., Pacific Northwest Bell, and General Telephone Company of the Northwest, Appellants, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, County of Multnomah, Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District, Respondents, State of Oregon, Defendant, Portland General Electric Company, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 7, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied December 21, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob Tanzer, Portland, argued the cause for appellants Northwest Natural Gas, Pacific Power & Light, Pacific Northwest Bell, and General Telephone Company of the Northwest. With him on the briefs was Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland.

Warren Hastings, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant Portland General Electric Co.

Christopher P. Thomas, City Atty., Portland, argued the cause for respondent City of Portland. With him on the brief was Kathryn Beaumont Imperati, Portland.

Paul R. Meyer, Portland, argued the cause for the respondents County of Multnomah and Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District. With him on the brief were Susan G. Whitney, and Kobin & Meyer, Portland, and John Leahy, Multnomah County Counsel, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Over the past decade, as a result of a planning process involving governmental units and local citizens, the Banfield Transitway Project was chosen from among 30 alternative proposals as the solution to the transportation problems along the Banfield Freeway/Burnside Street Corridor in Multnomah County. The project involves improvements to the existing Banfield Freeway as well as the construction of a light rail transit system (LRT) owned and operated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases