UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DANUBE CARPET MILLS, INC., and Carl D. Hagaman, Defendants-Appellants.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 30, 1984.
July 30, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Santarelli & Gimer, Richard H. Gimer, M. Stuart Madden, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants.
Richard H. Gimer, Washington, D.C., for intervenor.
William J. Roberts, Barry Grossman, Nancy C. Garrison, Benjamin P. Schoen, Antitrust Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Curtis E. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before RONEY, FAY and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Appellants,1 Danube Carpet Mills, Inc. (Danube) and its president, Carl D. Hagaman (Hagaman), appeal from an adverse summary judgment ruling in a civil penalty action instituted under the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTCA), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1). The government alleged that appellants violated a consent decree that they had entered into with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Appellants and the FTC entered into...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.