GIMPEL v. BOLSTEIN


125 Misc.2d 45 (1984)

Robert Gimpel, Plaintiff, v. Moe Bolstein et al., Defendants. In the Matter of the Dissolution of Gimpel Farms, Inc. Robert Gimpel, Petitioner; Moe Bolstein et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

May 30, 1984


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Berger, Steingut, Weiner, Fox & Stern (Theodore S. Steingut of counsel), for plaintiff-petitioner. David K. Kadane for Moe Bolstein and others, defendants-respondents. Ressa, Nappi & Weinig (Harvey Weinig of counsel), for Gimpel Farms, Inc., defendant-respondent.


ARTHUR W. LONSCHEIN, J.

Robert Gimpel is a shareholder in Gimpel Farms, Inc. Believing himself oppressed by the conduct of his fellow shareholders, he has brought a petition to dissolve the corporation pursuant to section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law and a derivative action pursuant to section 626 of the Business Corporation Law. The corporation and his fellow shareholders move to consolidate and dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases