PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Delaware.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 17, 1984.
January 17, 1984.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Alan T. Boyd of Bayard, Brill & Handelman, P.A., Wilmington, Del., and Kenneth E. Madsen, Richard L. Mayer and James Galbraith of Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.
Rudolf E. Hutz and James M. Mulligan of Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, Del., Stephen B. Judlowe and Francis J. Murphy of Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil, Blaustein & Judlowe, New York City, and James W. Grady, Jr., Frank M. Macioce, Jr., and Alice M. Clark, New York City, of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., of counsel, for defendant.
United States District Court, D. Delaware.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. ("Paine Webber"), commenced this litigation1 seeking a declaratory judgment of patent invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement of United States Patent No. 4,346,442 ("the '442 patent") entitled "Securities Brokerage-Cash Management System" owned by defendant, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. ("Merrill...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.