1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 685 P.2d
  5. 685 P.2d 999 (1984)
 

STATE v. FLORES

No. (10-81-05891; CA A22413; SC 28913.)

685 P.2d 999 (1984)

68 Or.App. 617

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Daniel FLORES, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided June 13, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied September 7, 1984.

Review Denied October 30, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Christine L. Dickey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

GILLETTE, Judge.

In this case involving criminal convictions for ex-convict in possession of a firearm and possession of a controlled substance, we are once again presented with an occasion to discuss an aspect of Oregon's developing state law of search and seizure. We previously applied federal law, including Oregon cases interpreting federal law, to affirm these convictions. State v. Flores, 58 Or.App. 437,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases