OPINION
PER CURIAM.
After publication of the opinion in the above-entitled case, on August 1, 1984, the defendant filed a motion for clarification and the state filed a petition for reargument. The defendant claims that the court overlooked his argument that the consent to search given by the defendant's wife was tainted by the initial illegal entry into the defendant's home by the police. In making this contention, the defendant is in error.
Earlier...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
